A.P.C.: what's actually on sale

32 live deals

32 of 32 deals

A.P.C. A.P.C. Ville Chino
$225retailer claims $350
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 55 why?

Deal score 55/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.5/34

Measured at −36% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Petit New Standard Jeans in Green
$185retailer claims $285
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 55 why?

Deal score 55/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.1/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Red
$85retailer claims $135
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 55 why?

Deal score 55/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. FRANCK T-SHIRT
$100retailer claims $165
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 55 why?

Deal score 55/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 26.8/34

Measured at −39% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. x Pokemon Coach Jacket in Navy Blue
$425retailer claims $610
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 54 why?

Deal score 54/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21.1/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Kyle T-Shirt in Lavender
$85retailer claims $135
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Elvis Denim Jacket
$325retailer claims $445
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 18.9/34

Measured at −27% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Bahia T-Shirt in Pink
$150retailer claims $230
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.9/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Curtis Cardigan
$225retailer claims $325
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21.3/34

Measured at −31% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Milo Hoodie in Grey/Green
$245retailer claims $350
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Auguste T-Shirt

Auguste T-Shirt

at Wish ATL

$99retailer claims $175
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 24% / p90 50% of 665 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.5/15

17% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. MARTIN JEAN

MARTIN JEAN

at Packer

$210retailer claims $350
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. RAPH S/S SHIRT
$147retailer claims $245
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Larry Hoodie in Lavender
$225retailer claims $295
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 16.9/34

Measured at −24% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. BOXY PETIT VPC T-SHIRT
$122retailer claims $175
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. STANLEY CHECK WOOL OVERSHIRT
$300retailer claims $430
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Kyle T-Shirt in Khaki
$85retailer claims $135
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Corduroy Standard Jeans
$195retailer claims $295
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.3/34

Measured at −34% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Green
$85retailer claims $135
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Bahia T-Shirt in Navy
$150retailer claims $230
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.9/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Black
$90retailer claims $135
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. x Pokemon Pikachu H Joggers in Grey
$145retailer claims $255
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Oneness doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Petit New Standard Jeans
$190retailer claims $285
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.5/15

17% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. MALO SHIRT

MALO SHIRT

at Packer

$185retailer claims $265
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.8/15

25% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. JACKSON SWEATER
$300retailer claims $430
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.8/15

25% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Chuck Pants
$200retailer claims $310
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.3/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Oneness doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Larry Hoodie in Khaki
$225retailer claims $295
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 38% / p90 61% of 257 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Oneness
score 44 why?

Deal score 44/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 16.9/34

Measured at −24% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. PIETER PANT

PIETER PANT

at Packer

$266retailer claims $380
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0/15

0% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 0 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. FERGUS PANT

FERGUS PANT

at Packer

$273retailer claims $390
corroborated · within A.P.C.'s markdown patternThe one source we haveCorroborated = exactly one independent source backs this discount.A.P.C. discount culture: p50 30% / p90 40% of 1241 tracked markdowns (Jul 22)How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Packer doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Chemisette Ross

Chemisette Ross

at Wish ATL

$86retailer claims $285
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Chemisette Roy

Chemisette Roy

at Wish ATL

$81retailer claims $270
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. MATHURIN PANT

MATHURIN PANT

at Packer

$126retailer claims $380
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 3h ago
Get it at Packer
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0/15

0% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 0 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 73 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →