A.P.C.: what's actually on sale

27 live deals

27 of 27 deals

A.P.C. A.P.C. Ville Chino
$225retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.5/34

Measured at −36% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Petit New Standard Jeans in Green
$185retailer claims $285
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.1/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. FRANCK T-SHIRT
$100retailer claims $165
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Packer
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 26.8/34

Measured at −39% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. x Pokemon Coach Jacket in Navy Blue
$425retailer claims $610
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21.1/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Kyle T-Shirt in Lavender
$85retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 37 why?

Deal score 37/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Red
$85retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 37 why?

Deal score 37/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Elvis Denim Jacket
$325retailer claims $445
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 18.9/34

Measured at −27% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Bahia T-Shirt in Pink
$150retailer claims $230
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.9/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Curtis Cardigan
$225retailer claims $325
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21.3/34

Measured at −31% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Auguste T-Shirt

Auguste T-Shirt

at Wish ATL

$99retailer claims $175
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.5/15

17% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. MARTIN JEAN

MARTIN JEAN

at Packer

$210retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Packer
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. RAPH S/S SHIRT
$147retailer claims $245
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Packer
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Larry Hoodie in Lavender
$225retailer claims $295
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 16.9/34

Measured at −24% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. STANLEY CHECK WOOL OVERSHIRT
$300retailer claims $430
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Packer
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Kyle T-Shirt in Khaki
$85retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 34 why?

Deal score 34/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Corduroy Standard Jeans
$195retailer claims $295
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 34 why?

Deal score 34/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.3/34

Measured at −34% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Green
$85retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 34 why?

Deal score 34/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.3/34

Measured at −37% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Bahia T-Shirt in Navy
$150retailer claims $230
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23.9/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Milo Hoodie in Grey/Green
$245retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. VPC Color H T-Shirt in Grey/Black
$90retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 32 why?

Deal score 32/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. x Pokemon Pikachu H Joggers in Grey
$145retailer claims $255
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 32 why?

Deal score 32/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Oneness doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Petit New Standard Jeans
$190retailer claims $285
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.5/15

17% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Chuck Pants
$200retailer claims $310
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.3/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Oneness doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Larry Hoodie in Khaki
$225retailer claims $295
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 29 why?

Deal score 29/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 16.9/34

Measured at −24% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Chemisette Ross

Chemisette Ross

at Wish ATL

$86retailer claims $285
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 26 why?

Deal score 26/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. Chemisette Roy

Chemisette Roy

at Wish ATL

$81retailer claims $270
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 26 why?

Deal score 26/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. MATHURIN PANT

MATHURIN PANT

at Packer

$126retailer claims $380
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 40d ago
Get it at Packer
score 23 why?

Deal score 23/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0/15

0% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 0 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →