DL1961: what's actually on sale

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

83% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −26% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

83% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

83% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

15% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for DL1961 — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “DL1961” averages 14 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.