East Pacific Trade: what's actually on sale

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Concepts doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −14% against the was-price, which fits Likelihood's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

Likelihood doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

Hand-set rating for Likelihood — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.