Fucking Awesome — men's tees & shirts: what's actually on sale

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

Measured: Wikipedia “Fucking Awesome” averages 52 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.