Puma — sneakers: what's actually on sale

Lifestyle icons — Dunks, Sambas, 574s — tracked across the stores that actually discount them, with resale floors as an independent price check.

186 live deals

96 of 96 deals

Puma NOAH SUEDE CLASSIC V "NAVY"
$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma NOAH SUEDE CLASSIC V "GOLDEN BROWN"
$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma RHUIGI X TRINOMIC XT-2

RHUIGI X TRINOMIC XT-2

at Social Status

$84retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma VELOPHASIS FACTORY "DUSKY BLUE"
$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PLEASURES VELOPHASIS LAYERS "CAYENNE PEPPER-ASTRO RED"

PLEASURES VELOPHASIS LAYERS "CAYENNE PEPPER-ASTRO RED"

at Social Status · also at 1 store from $98

$84retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma LEATHER PALERMO

LEATHER PALERMO

at Social Status

$54retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma VELOPHASIS PHASED

VELOPHASIS PHASED

at Social Status · also at 1 store from $78

$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Guizio x Puma Klim L - Alpine Snow/Black
$71.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma CELL GEO 1 - Stormy Slate/Mineral Gray
$82.50retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Danielle Cathari x Puma Suede Fuzzy - Mars Red
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Danielle Cathari x Puma Speedcat Washed - Pistachio Green
$66retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PALERMO OG "LIGHT MINT/ORCHID SHADOW"
$60retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.5/15

90% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma King Indoor Icons - Black/Frosted Ivory
$66retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.6/15

91% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma CELL GEO 1 - Black/Birch Tree
$82.50retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.8/15

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Talon OG - Sandstone/Black
$82.50retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 51 why?

Deal score 51/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.8/15

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Fast & Furious x Puma MB.05 Miami - Sun Struck/Ravish
$74.25retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12.3/15

82% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PALERMO OG "SILVER SKY/CAYENNE PEPPER"
$60retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma H-Street Strap Nylon - Black/Warm White
$65retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Talon OG - Seafoam/Black
$82.50retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Pleasures Velophasis Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Cream/Black
$89.97retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma MB.05 'Mist' - White/Gold
$71.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.9/15

73% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Speedcat Decon - White/White
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11/15

73% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Flau'jae x Puma All-Pro NITRO 2 - Sand Dune/Pure Pink
$77retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.7/15

65% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Clyde Base Mens Lifestyle Shoe - White/Gold
$59.97retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.4/15

63% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 8 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Skepta x Puma Skope WP (White)
$75retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PLEASURES VELOPHASIS OVERDYED "BIRCH TREE/ANISE FLOWER"

PLEASURES VELOPHASIS OVERDYED "BIRCH TREE/ANISE FLOWER"

at Social Status · also at 1 store from $105

$105retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SLIPSTREAM LO RETRO "WHITE/ZINNIA"
$54retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.3/15

56% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma MB.05 'Melo World' - Aquatic/For All Time Red
$84.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12.3/15

82% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Speedcat Decon - Black/Black
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma DISTINCT LIFE X SUEDE VTG
$54retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Represent X Puma King Indoor 'Light Sand'
$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Skepta x Puma Skope 'Back to School' - Black
$110retailer claims $200
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Clyde Mens Lifestyle Shoe - White/Grey
$59.97retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Mostro Mesh

Mostro Mesh

at Wish ATL

$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 44 why?

Deal score 44/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.8/15

45% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma JUNE AMBROSE X PREVAIL

JUNE AMBROSE X PREVAIL

at Social Status

$66retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5.5/15

36% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma x Ferrari RS Track x JV
$60retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Suede Mens Lifestyle Shoes (Teal/Purple)
$39.98retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Shoe Palace
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Shoe Palace's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Shoe Palace — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Homura OG+ - Matte Silver/Heat Fire
$90retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Homura OG+ - Heat Fire/Electric Lime
$90retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Speedcat Plus Leather Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Puma White/Puma Black
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 19.1/34

Measured at −27% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.8/15

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Super Team OG Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Black
$69.97retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.9/34

Measured at −36% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma R698 Minerals
$65retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Blaze of Glory STB
$75retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma VELOPHASIS PHASED

VELOPHASIS PHASED

at APB Store · also at 1 store from $78

$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at APB Store
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for APB Store — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PALERMO OG "NEW NAVY/WHITE/TEAM GOLD"
$60retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Clyde Q3 'Rhuigi'
$65retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma RS-TRCK Outdoor
$55retailer claims $135
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma RX 737 New Vintage
$65retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Speedcat Premium 'Dark Olive'
$66retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.7/15

31% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma NO/FAITH STUDIOS x Puma Beisser - Chocolate/Chocolate
$104.50retailer claims $190
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Clyde Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Snow/Blue
$84.98retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.3/34

Measured at −29% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.7/15

78% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Palermo Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Blue/Almond
$74.98retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 22/34

Measured at −32% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Blaze of Glory MMQ
$60retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SKEPTA FOREVER "BLACK"

SKEPTA FOREVER "BLACK"

at Social Status

$120retailer claims $200
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.8/15

25% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma x Dapper Dan Clyde Pre-Game Runway
$80retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.8/15

25% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Plexus Tasteless Tastemaker
$75retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.3/15

22% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma One Piece Suede Red Haired Shanks Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Red/Blue
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.3/15

22% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Speedcat Y2K - New Navy/Cool Light Gray
$71.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.8/15

25% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Velophasis Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Beige
$89.98retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 21.4/34

Measured at −31% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.4/15

63% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 8 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Slipstream Lo Wabi Sabi Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Grey/Maroon
$59.97retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.8/15

92% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SLIPSTREAM LO RETRO "WHITE/RED"
$54retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at APB Store
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.3/15

89% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for APB Store — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma LAQUAN SMITH SPEEDCAT "RED/BLACK/SILVER"
$88retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma LAQUAN SMITH X SPEEDCAT MID "RED/BLACK"
$144retailer claims $180
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma LAQUAN SMITH X SPEEDCAT MID "BLACK/WHITE"
$144retailer claims $180
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma ASAP ROCKY INHALE DISTRESSED "WARM WHITE/ BLACK/ PELE YELLOW"
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.4/15

63% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SUEDE FUZZY DANIELLE CATHARI
$88retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Bodega
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Bodega's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Bodega — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SPEEDCAT WASHED DANIELLE CATHARI
$88retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Bodega
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Bodega's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Bodega — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PUMA X SALEHE BEMBURY VELUM SB NITRO
$128retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Bodega
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Bodega's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 13 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Bodega — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma CELL GEO 1

CELL GEO 1

at Bodega

$120retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Bodega
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Bodega's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Bodega — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma x Diet Starts Monday Slipstream
$65retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Represent x Puma King Indoor - Light Sand/Frosted Ivory
$71.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.7/15

18% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Mostro XC Gore-Tex (Black)
$65retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.3/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma x REPRESENT Super Team (White)
$55retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.3/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma JUNE AMBROSE X SLIPSTREAM
$90retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma RS-2K Future Mutants Men's Shoes
$66retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Select Easy Rider Vintage
$50retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.4/15

9% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Speedcat Plus 'Red'
$66retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.3/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma SPEEDCAT FADED WMNS
$60retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Bodega
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Bodega's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.3/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Bodega — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma A$AP Rocky x Puma Mostro OG Snakeskin Mens Lifestyle Shoes (Puma Black/Desert Dust)
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Shoe Palace
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Shoe Palace's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5.5/15

37% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 19 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Shoe Palace — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Represent x Puma Majesty - Warm White/Black
$66retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.4/15

9% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Harry Potter x Palermo Gryffindor Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Dark Crimson/Yellow
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.7/15

11% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Harry Potter x Palermo Slytherin Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Dark Myrtle/Black
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.7/15

11% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Speedcat Premium - Cool Light Gray/Matte Silver
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.4/15

9% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Suede Charles F. Stead II - Green Glimmer/White
$66retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Suede VTG Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Pink
$49.97retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.4/15

9% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma PLEASURES VELOPHASIS OVERDYED "BIRCH TREE/ANISE FLOWER"

PLEASURES VELOPHASIS OVERDYED "BIRCH TREE/ANISE FLOWER"

at APB Store · also at 1 store from $105

$105retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at APB Store
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 13/34

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for APB Store — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma H-Street Premium (Brandy/Toasted Almond)
$45retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.9/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma H-Street Premium (Black)
$55retailer claims $90
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 26.5/34

Measured at −39% against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.9/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Sprint (White)
$55retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.9/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma JUNE AMBROSE X RALPH SAMPSON MID
$70retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Social Status
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Social Status's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.8/15

45% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Social Status — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Suede Vintage Pam
$90retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Mostro XC 'Dusty Green'
$78retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1/15

7% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Speedcat Faded - Cool Cucumber/Alpine Snow
$55retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.9/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Puma Mostro Ecstasy - Fresh Mint/White
$66retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.8/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 18 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Velophasis PRM Mens Lifestyle Shoe - Beige
$99.98retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20/34

Measured at −29% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.3/15

56% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma STAR OG "WHITE/ VAPOR GREY"
$77retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at APB Store
score 37 why?

Deal score 37/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 13/34

Measured at −30% against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.5/15

90% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 9 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for APB Store — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →