Reebok — sneakers: what's actually on sale

Lifestyle icons — Dunks, Sambas, 574s — tracked across the stores that actually discount them, with resale floors as an independent price check.

76 live deals

76 of 76 deals

Reebok CLASSIC LEATHER - CORE BLACK / FOOTWEAR WHITE / DIGITAL BLUE
$20retailer claims $40
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x Sneeze Magazine Club C Grounds 'Earth'
$65retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Insta Pump

Insta Pump

at Wish ATL

$153retailer claims $255
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.7/15

78% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x Pleasures Club C Bulc 'Not Guilty'
$70retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x Sneeze Magazine Club C Grounds 'Cool Grey'
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Classic Leather Plus
$60retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.7/15

65% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 11 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLUB C REVENGE - WHITE / COLLEGIATE GOLD / PURPLE
$40retailer claims $80
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.2/15

55% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Workout Plus - White/Vector Blue
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.6/15

57% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Club C Revenge
$55retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 44 why?

Deal score 44/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7/15

47% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Premier Road Ultra
$111retailer claims $185
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.9/15

46% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Club LTD

Club LTD

at Wish ATL

$105retailer claims $175
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5.4/15

36% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X SNEEZE LT COURT - VIPGRN/ CHALK/ CBLACK
$60retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits UNDEFEATED's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLASSIC LEATHER - Chalk / Wild Brown / Vector Navy
$50retailer claims $85
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.3/15

22% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLUB C REVENGE - WHITE / MARS RED
$40retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Workout Plus - Chalk/Dark Green
$60.50retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.2/15

21% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok BB 4000 II - White/Gold
$99.99retailer claims $250
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.6/15

91% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 10 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Floatride

Floatride

at Wish ATL

$120retailer claims $240
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.5/15

17% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Mens Hammer Street Shoes
$120retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Extra Butter
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Extra Butter's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 13 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Extra Butter — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x JJJJound Mens Club C 85 Shoes
$75retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Extra Butter
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Extra Butter's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.8/15

19% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Extra Butter — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok QUESTION MID "GREY SUEDE"

QUESTION MID "GREY SUEDE"

at Lapstone & Hammer

$100retailer claims $170
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.2/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok THE ANSWER DMX "BLACK / GOLD"

THE ANSWER DMX "BLACK / GOLD"

at Lapstone & Hammer

$100retailer claims $170
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.9/15

13% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 16 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X JJJOUND NPC II - FTWWHT/ CWHITE/ CHALK
$80retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits UNDEFEATED's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.1/15

7% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok TYRRELL WINSTON X REEBOK QUESTION MID - WHITE / BLACK
$100retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 37 why?

Deal score 37/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.6/34

Measured at −38% against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.1/15

14% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Beatnik 'Mountain Research'
$70retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 37 why?

Deal score 37/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.9/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok QUESTION MID "DENVER NUGGETS"

QUESTION MID "DENVER NUGGETS"

at Lapstone & Hammer

$100retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 25.6/34

Measured at −38% against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.3/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 IF MO - WHITE
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 36 why?

Deal score 36/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9.2/15

62% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok QUESTION MID (GS) "DENVER NUGGETS"
$60retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Lapstone & Hammer doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok SNEEZE X REEBOK LT COURT "VIPER GREEN"
$50retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok W Classic AZ

W Classic AZ

at Wish ATL

$38retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 39d ago
Get it at Wish ATL
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Wish ATL's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Wish ATL doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Wish ATL — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Club C 85 Vintage Womens Lifestyle Shoe (Chalk White)
$39.98retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 39d ago
Get it at Shoe Palace
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Shoe Palace's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Shoe Palace doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Shoe Palace — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PREMIER ROAD ULTRA "BLACK METALLIC"
$144retailer claims $180
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.9/15

73% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 ZS MO - WHITE
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.3/15

56% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLASSIC LEATHER X WHIM GOLF
$91retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 35 why?

Deal score 35/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Cam Hicks BB 4000 II - Damaged
$28retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.8/15

45% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Classic Leather Plus - Damaged
$27retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.1/15

47% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 8 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Beatnik - Damaged
$27retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.2/15

41% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x ANUEL AA BB 4000 II
$80retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 23/34

Measured at −33% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.8/15

5% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 20 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Cam Hicks BB 4000 II
$49retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.8/15

45% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 ZS MO - BLACK
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.7/15

44% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 CC TL - RED
$90retailer claims $300
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 33 why?

Deal score 33/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.4/15

43% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Beatnik

Reebok Beatnik

at Oneness

$25retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 32 why?

Deal score 32/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5.3/15

35% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PREMIER ROAD ULTRA "GREEN METALLIC"
$144retailer claims $180
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 32 why?

Deal score 32/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.2/15

55% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PREMIER ROAD ULTRA "CHERRY METALLIC"
$136retailer claims $170
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 32 why?

Deal score 32/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.2/15

55% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok MOUNTAIN RESEARCH X REEBOK CLUB C MID II - WHITE / COBALT / CHALK
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.5/15

30% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok WMNS CLUB C DOUBLE REVENGE - CLOUD WHITE / SOFT ECRU / FROST BERRY
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PRESEASON 94 "LIGHTS OUT"
$104retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok HAMMER PRO LTD "TRIPLE WHITE"
$112retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.8/15

45% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 IF MO - BLACK
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.6/15

31% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 CC TL - GREY/ WHITE/ BLACK
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 31 why?

Deal score 31/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.3/15

29% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok BEATNIK MOC - BLACK / BLACK

BEATNIK MOC - BLACK / BLACK

at Lapstone & Hammer

$40retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.3/15

22% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 9 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok EAMES OFFICE X REEBOK CLASSIC LEATHER "THE COLOURING TOY"
$50retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.2/15

21% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 14 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok QUESTION MID (GS) "I3 MOTORSPORTS"
$69.99retailer claims $100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →sizes unverifiedchecked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

Lapstone & Hammer doesn't publish size-level stock, so this row takes 50% credit — and the whole score is multiplied ×0.85 (noted below).

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

×0.85 — sizes unverified at this store

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok Club C Revenge - Damaged
$27retailer claims $110
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4/15

27% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 CL MO - BLACK
$105retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.5/15

23% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 CC MO - BLACK
$105retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3.5/15

23% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PACKER X PREMIER ROAD MODERN
$70retailer claims $220
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 30 why?

Deal score 30/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4/15

27% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x Sneeze Magazine Club C Grounds 'Earth' - Damaged
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 29 why?

Deal score 29/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok HAMMER PRO LTD "SAGE"
$112retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 29 why?

Deal score 29/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5.5/15

36% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 TQ MO - BLACK
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 29 why?

Deal score 29/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.3/15

15% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 TQ MO - WHITE
$120retailer claims $400
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 29 why?

Deal score 29/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 2.3/15

15% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok BEATNIK MOC - GOLD / BLACK

BEATNIK MOC - GOLD / BLACK

at Lapstone & Hammer

$40retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.9/15

13% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 8 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok BEATNIK "QUILTED CANVAS" - VECTOR RED
$40retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok BEATNIK "QUILTED CANVAS" - BATIK BLUE
$40retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLUB C MID II VINTAGE - WHITE / COBALT
$40retailer claims $85
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok DMX TRAIL SHADOW - PUGRY2 / CDGRY7/BOUGRY
$50retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Brain Child x Reebok DMX Series 3000 - White/Energy Red
$105retailer claims $140
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.4/15

9% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PREMIER ROAD ULTRA "TONAL GREY"
$136retailer claims $170
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Packer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 4.1/15

27% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 11 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok REEBOK X MAISON MARGIELA PROJECT 0 CL MO - CLOUDWHITE
$105retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.2/15

8% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 13 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PACKER X REEBOK QUESTION MID
$70retailer claims $160
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.7/15

11% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 18 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok DMX TRAIL SHADOW "BRIGHT OCHRE"
$72retailer claims $175
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 28 why?

Deal score 28/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.8/15

12% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 17 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLUB C 85 - WHITE / BURGUNDY

CLUB C 85 - WHITE / BURGUNDY

at Lapstone & Hammer

$60retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 27 why?

Deal score 27/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok CLUB C REVENGE - WHITE / COURT BLUE
$60retailer claims $75
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Lapstone & Hammer
score 27 why?

Deal score 27/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Lapstone & Hammer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 3/15

20% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Lapstone & Hammer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x ANUEL AA BB 4000 II - Damaged
$28retailer claims $120
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 27 why?

Deal score 27/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.8/15

5% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 20 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok PACKER X ANSWER IV OG "WHITE"
$70retailer claims $180
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Packer
score 27 why?

Deal score 27/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1/15

7% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 15 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Packer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok JJJJound x Reebok Club C 85 - Cork/White
$75retailer claims $150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 27 why?

Deal score 27/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.5 (unverified) 17/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the retailer's own claimed was-price — no independent backing found, so it counts at half weight (×0.5). Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0.8/15

6% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 18 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Reebok Reebok x Tobe Nwigwe Mens Chukwu OTU Shoes
$160retailer claims $200
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 39d ago
Get it at Extra Butter
score 25 why?

Deal score 25/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 14.5/34

Measured at −20% against the was-price, which fits Extra Butter's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 1.5/15

10% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 20 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Extra Butter — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Reebok” averages 994 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 9 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Reebok — Yung Lean”) · carried by ~9 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →