Men's pants & chinos: what's actually on sale

Chinos, technical pants and trackpants — sized by waist and inseam where merchants expose it.

400 live deals

96 of 96 deals

Rick Owens RICK OWENS | LEO PROTHMANN CHAP PANTS
$2985.09retailer claims $5970
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 54 why?

Deal score 54/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 11.7/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Rick Owens” averages 1,728 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 28 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “RICK OWENS — Ufo361”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Rick Owens RICK OWENS | VELVET CARGOBELAS PANTS
$1037.09retailer claims $2075
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 54 why?

Deal score 54/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 11.7/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Rick Owens” averages 1,728 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 28 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “RICK OWENS — Ufo361”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Maison Margiela Cargo Pants (Black)

Cargo Pants (Black)

at Union Los Angeles

$489retailer claims $1630
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 54 why?

Deal score 54/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Maison Margiela” averages 309 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 59 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Maison Margiela — Future”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Fashion Nova Summer Games Stacked Skinny Flare - Brown
$25retailer claims $49.99
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Fashion Nova
score 54 why?

Deal score 54/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Fashion Nova's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Fashion Nova — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Fashion Nova” averages 172 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 30 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Fashion Nova — Playboi Carti”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

TOM FORD TOM FORD | VIRGIN WOOL PLEATED PANTS
$916.09retailer claims $2290
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.2/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Tom Ford” averages 1,820 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 45 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 8 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Tom Ford — JAŸ-Z”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

CHLOÉ CHLOÉ | RUFFLED FLARED PANTS IN LEATHER
$1676.09retailer claims $4190
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 52 why?

Deal score 52/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9.8/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Chloé” averages 176 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 62 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Rick Owens Rick Owens Strobe Convertible Pants (Ash)
$880retailer claims $2215
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 11.7/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Rick Owens” averages 1,728 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 28 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “RICK OWENS — Ufo361”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Honor The Gift Honor The Gift Mens Flower Beaded Pant
$149.50retailer claims $299
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Extra Butter
score 50 why?

Deal score 50/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Extra Butter's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Extra Butter — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 7.5/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~6 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

MARNI MARNI Water-repellent Taffeta Cargo Pants (Black)
$460retailer claims $1150
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.8/12

Measured: 5 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “СВИТЕР MARNI — 4n Way”) · carried by ~5 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

MARNI MARNI Wide Trousers (Cement)
$500retailer claims $1250
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.8/12

Measured: 5 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “СВИТЕР MARNI — 4n Way”) · carried by ~5 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

MARNI MARNI Wool Trousers (Deep sage)
$350retailer claims $875
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.8/12

Measured: 5 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “СВИТЕР MARNI — 4n Way”) · carried by ~5 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Puma Liberaiders x Puma Pants - Velvet Moss
$90.75retailer claims $165
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 49 why?

Deal score 49/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Puma (brand)” averages 1,460 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 11 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 5 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Puma — Elena”) · carried by ~11 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

GANNI GANNI Future Twill Suiting Elasticated Pants (Port Royale)
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for GANNI so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

GANNI GANNI Tapestry Twill Pants (Jadeite )
$160retailer claims $390
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for GANNI so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

WALES BONNER Message Trousers (TR01-CO18-3790-CAMO-MULTI)
$550retailer claims $1100
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for WALES BONNER so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Wales Bonner — Acidfrank”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

MARTINE ROSE Narrow Front Trousers (326-WET-LOOK-PETROL)
$322.50retailer claims $645
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for MARTINE ROSE so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

ANN DEMEULEMEESTER Shania Skinny Trousers (B0011424-LT117-038-AUBERGINE)
$1979.40retailer claims $3299
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for ANN DEMEULEMEESTER so far: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 3 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Ann Demeulemeester — МАЛЬБЭК (MALBEK)”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

DRIES VAN NOTEN DRIES VAN NOTEN | ELASTICATED PANTS
$378.09retailer claims $935
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for DRIES VAN NOTEN so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “NY Lipps (Dries Van Noten 2020 Remix) — Soulwax”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Dries Van Noten Pencks Pants (Camel)

Pencks Pants (Camel)

at Union Los Angeles

$549retailer claims $915
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Dries Van Noten so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “NY Lipps (Dries Van Noten 2020 Remix) — Soulwax”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Dries Van Noten Penny Long Pants (Black)

Penny Long Pants (Black)

at Union Los Angeles

$498retailer claims $830
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Dries Van Noten so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “NY Lipps (Dries Van Noten 2020 Remix) — Soulwax”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

UNDEFEATED UNDEFEATED RIPSTOP CARGO SHORT
$69retailer claims $138
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits UNDEFEATED's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for UNDEFEATED so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

UNDEFEATED UNDEFEATED WORK SHORT
$62retailer claims $125
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits UNDEFEATED's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for UNDEFEATED so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

UNDEFEATED UNDEFEATED LIGHTWEIGHT CARGO PANT
$82retailer claims $165
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at UNDEFEATED
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits UNDEFEATED's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for UNDEFEATED — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for UNDEFEATED so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Wales Bonner Elijah Trouser

Elijah Trouser

at Union Los Angeles

$230retailer claims $755
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Wales Bonner so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Wales Bonner — Acidfrank”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Carhartt WIP Carhartt WIP Single Knee Pant - Shale
$122.20retailer claims $188
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9/12

Hand-set editorial floor 9/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Carhartt WIP so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Ice Cream Ice Cream Clarity Cargo Pants - Camo
$118.25retailer claims $215
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Ice Cream so far: no clean signal yet.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Ksubi Ksubi Troop Cargo Pant - Camo
$143retailer claims $260
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 48 why?

Deal score 48/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Measured: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Ksubi — Keith Ape”) · carried by ~4 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Honor The Gift Honor The Gift Twill Party Pant B-Summer (Blue)
$70retailer claims $145
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 7.5/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~6 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Maison Margiela Sports Trousers (S50KA0675-S22460-RED)
$455retailer claims $910
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Maison Margiela” averages 309 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 59 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Maison Margiela — Future”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Nike NSW Style Essentials Utility Mens Pants (Beige)
$49.98retailer claims $85
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Shoe Palace
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Shoe Palace's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 8 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Shoe Palace — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Nike, Inc.” averages 2,355 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 89 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Nike — RIN”) · carried by 16+ independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Honor The Gift Honor The Gift Washed Twill Pant - Taupe
$109.45retailer claims $199
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 47 why?

Deal score 47/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 7.5/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~6 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Fashion Nova Straight Leg Astra Nova Twill Pant - Black
$21.98retailer claims $54.99
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Fashion Nova
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Fashion Nova's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.4/15

43% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Fashion Nova — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Fashion Nova” averages 172 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 30 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Fashion Nova — Playboi Carti”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Acne Studios Leather Trousers (AK0760-PISTACHIO-GREEN)
$1350retailer claims $2250
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 4.3/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Acne Studios” averages 135 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “ACNE STUDIOS — Fłacko & Akka”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

VALENTINO VALENTINO | DIAGONAL COTTON PANTS
$1040.09retailer claims $2600
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 46 why?

Deal score 46/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3.3/12

Measured: 6 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “VALENTINO — 24kGoldn”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

TOM FORD TOM FORD | WASHED COTTON SILK BLEND DUCHESSE TAILORED STRAIGHT PANTS
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.2/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Tom Ford” averages 1,820 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 45 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 8 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Tom Ford — JAŸ-Z”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

TOM FORD TOM FORD | PLEATED WIDE LEG SILK PANTS
$916.09retailer claims $2290
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 10.2/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Tom Ford” averages 1,820 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 45 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 8 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Tom Ford — JAŸ-Z”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Carhartt WIP Carhartt WIP Double Knee Pant - Hamilton Brown
$108.90retailer claims $198
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 9/15

60% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9/12

Hand-set editorial floor 9/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Carhartt WIP so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Ksubi Ksubi Fugitive Kash Box Cargo Pants - Black
$121retailer claims $220
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Measured: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Ksubi — Keith Ape”) · carried by ~4 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Ksubi Ksubi Troop Cargo Pant - Black Fade
$132retailer claims $240
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 45 why?

Deal score 45/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Measured: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Ksubi — Keith Ape”) · carried by ~4 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

GANNI GANNI Stretch Stripe Tailoring Capri Pants (Phantom)
$140retailer claims $345
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for GANNI so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

BALENCIAGA Balenciaga | Biker Pants
$3460.09retailer claims $8650
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 1/12

Measured: 3 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

BALENCIAGA BALENCIAGA | LARGE TAILORED PANTS
$596.09retailer claims $1490
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 43 why?

Deal score 43/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 1/12

Measured: 3 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Gymshark The Gymshark Pants Elite Tall - Black
$24retailer claims $80
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Gymshark
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Gymshark's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 8.6/15

57% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Gymshark — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Gymshark” averages 342 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “GYMSHARK — Lil Twin (2Twin)”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Toad&Co Mission Ridge Straight Chino
$58.99retailer claims $98
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Toad&Co
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.1/34

Measured at −40% against the was-price, which fits Toad&Co's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Toad&Co — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Toad&Co: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Toad&Co Mission Ridge Chino Short
$49.99retailer claims $82
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Toad&Co
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 26.6/34

Measured at −39% against the was-price, which fits Toad&Co's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Toad&Co — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Toad&Co: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Richer Poorer Mens Pleated Lightweight Chino - Stretch Cotton Twill - Khaki
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Andie
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Andie's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Andie — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Richer Poorer: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Richer Poorer Mens Pleated Lightweight Chino - Stretch Cotton Twill - Cypress
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Andie
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Andie's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Andie — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Richer Poorer: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Richer Poorer Mens Pleated Lightweight Chino - Stretch Cotton Twill - Blue Nights
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Andie
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Andie's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Andie — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Richer Poorer: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Beyond Yoga Element Men's Chino Trouser 32"
$76.50retailer claims $128
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Beyond Yoga
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Beyond Yoga's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Beyond Yoga — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Beyond Yoga” averages 11 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Faherty Reserve Twill 5-Pocket Pant - Kodiak Brown
$99retailer claims $198
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Faherty
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Faherty's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Faherty — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Faherty: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Faherty Stretch Terry 5-Pocket - Spring Quartz
$99retailer claims $198
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Faherty
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Faherty's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Faherty — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Faherty: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

KIKO KOSTADINOV Fosco Wool Asymmetric Panel Trousers (KKSS26T12-32-UMBER-BROWN)
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for KIKO KOSTADINOV: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

KIDILL Pink Distressed Graphic Baggy Sweatpants (KL1079-PINK)
$247.50retailer claims $495
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for KIDILL: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

TAREET Brown Leather Reverse Seam Trousers (REVERSED-SEAM-BAGGY-BEIGE)
$1592.50retailer claims $3185
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for TAREET: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

KIKO KOSTADINOV Alec K-Dart Jersey Trousers (T07-27-BROWN-BLACK-GREEN-STRIP)
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for KIKO KOSTADINOV: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

KIKO KOSTADINOV Alec K-Dart Jersey Trousers (T07-24-BLACK-GREY-TEAL-STRIPES)
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for KIKO KOSTADINOV: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

OAMC Achilles Pants (24E28OAU80-BLACK)
$575.40retailer claims $959
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for OAMC: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

LEON EMANUEL BLANCK Distortion Skinny Pants (DISTORTION-SKINNY-PANTS-BLACK)
$557.50retailer claims $1115
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for LEON EMANUEL BLANCK: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

BOTTER Classic Wool Trousers (5030B-W092-FINE-WOOL-BEIGE)
$472.50retailer claims $945
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for BOTTER: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Botter — Brendan Peyper”) — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

AARON ESH Cargo Pants (AE23TR09-GREY)
$392.50retailer claims $785
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for AARON ESH: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

WALTER VAN BEIRENDONCK Wrestle Trousers (2003-WRESTLE-CC13-GREY-MELANGE)
$731.40retailer claims $1219
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for WALTER VAN BEIRENDONCK: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

BOTTER Pleat Wide Classic Trousers (5040-W078-BLACK)
$512.50retailer claims $1025
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 1 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for BOTTER: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Botter — Brendan Peyper”) — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

S.S.DALEY S.S.DALEY | 'TURING' STRAIGHT LEG TROUSER
$190.09retailer claims $475
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for S.S.DALEY: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

RRR123 Meta River Pant (Black)

Meta River Pant (Black)

at Union Los Angeles

$530retailer claims $1323
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for RRR123: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

PDF Channel PDF Channel Fat Angelo Pants - Green
$297retailer claims $540
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for PDF Channel: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Carhartt WIP Carhartt WIP Aviation Pant - Leather
$86.90retailer claims $158
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6/15

40% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9/12

Hand-set editorial floor 9/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Carhartt WIP so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Nanamica Cargo Deck Pants
$196retailer claims $280
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Premier
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Premier's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Premier — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Nanamica so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Filson Granite Mountain 5-pocket Pants - Washed Faded Black
$90.30retailer claims $129
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Filson
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Filson's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 6 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Filson — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Filson so far: Wikipedia “Filson (company)” averages 50 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

RRR123 RAW HE ROSE 4 PANTS (Khaki)

RAW HE ROSE 4 PANTS (Khaki)

at Union Los Angeles

$512retailer claims $1023
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for RRR123: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Jordan Jordan Flight Woven Mens Pants - Black/Sail
$93.75retailer claims $125
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 42 why?

Deal score 42/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12.5/15

83% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Air Jordan” averages 891 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · carried by 16+ independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Faherty Coastline Chino - Deep Marine
$109retailer claims $178
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Faherty
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 26.4/34

Measured at −39% against the was-price, which fits Faherty's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 12 of 12 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Faherty — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Faherty: 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

DIESEL D-Boix Distressed Plaid Trousers (A18159-OCMBR-GREY)
$447.50retailer claims $895
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 8.6/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Diesel (company)” averages 381 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 37 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Diesel — YoungBoy Never Broke Again”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

JACQUEMUS JACQUEMUS | FLORAL TAIOLO PANTS
$203.09retailer claims $565
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for JACQUEMUS so far: 3 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Malbon Golf Malbon Golf Mens La Perla Pant
$118.80retailer claims $198
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Extra Butter
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Extra Butter's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Extra Butter — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Hand-set editorial floor 3/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Malbon Golf so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Stone Island Stone Island Trousers (Blue Rinse)
$318retailer claims $455
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Concepts
score 41 why?

Deal score 41/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Concepts's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 11.3/15

75% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Concepts — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 9/12

Hand-set editorial floor 9/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Stone Island so far: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Gymshark The Gymshark Pants - Ash Grey
$18retailer claims $60
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Gymshark
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Gymshark's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.4/15

43% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Gymshark — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Gymshark” averages 342 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “GYMSHARK — Lil Twin (2Twin)”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Gymshark The Gymshark Pants Elite Tall - Heavy Blue
$24retailer claims $80
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Gymshark
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Gymshark's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 6.4/15

43% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Gymshark — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6.4/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Gymshark” averages 342 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “GYMSHARK — Lil Twin (2Twin)”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Beyond Yoga Element Men's Chino Trouser 30"
$76.50retailer claims $128
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Beyond Yoga
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Beyond Yoga's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12.5/15

83% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Beyond Yoga — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0.1/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Beyond Yoga” averages 11 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 1 article mentions it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

A.P.C. A.P.C. Ville Chino
$225retailer claims $350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Oneness
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24.5/34

Measured at −36% against the was-price, which fits Oneness's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Oneness — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for A.P.C. so far: Wikipedia “A.P.C.” averages 79 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “A.P.C.H. — Chuck Adams”).

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Better With Age Isaac Kantha Short (Multi)

Isaac Kantha Short (Multi)

at Union Los Angeles

$539retailer claims $1348
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Union Los Angeles
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Union Los Angeles's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Union Los Angeles — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Better With Age — Sarah Gross”) · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Nike Life Fatigue Trousers Mens Pant - Tan
$97.50retailer claims $130
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Nice Kicks
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 17.7/34

Measured at −25% against the was-price, which fits Nice Kicks's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.7/15

71% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Nice Kicks — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Nike, Inc.” averages 2,355 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 89 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Nike — RIN”) · carried by 16+ independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Filson Dry Tin Double Front Pants - Natural Seed
$125.30retailer claims $179
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Filson
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Filson's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 13.5/15

90% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 18 of 20 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Filson — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for Filson so far: Wikipedia “Filson (company)” averages 50 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Kody Phillips Rip Van Kody Cargo

Rip Van Kody Cargo

at Xhibition

$278.60retailer claims $398
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Xhibition
score 40 why?

Deal score 40/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 20.9/34

Measured at −30% against the was-price, which fits Xhibition's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 4 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Xhibition — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 4.5/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~3 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Maison Margiela MAISON MARGIELA | SWEATPANTS
$485.09retailer claims $970
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 0/15

0% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 0 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 12/12

Measured: Wikipedia “Maison Margiela” averages 309 reader views/day (30-day, humans only) · 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 59 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Maison Margiela — Future”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Metalwood Studio Metalwood Studio 5-Pocket Twill Pant - Natural
$148.20retailer claims $228
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 24/34

Measured at −35% against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 15/15

100% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Metalwood Studio: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Godspeed New York Godspeed New York Skidrow Flared Cargo Pants - Clay
$181.50retailer claims $330
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Sneaker Politics
score 39 why?

Deal score 39/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Sneaker Politics's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 12/15

80% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 4 of 5 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Sneaker Politics — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Godspeed New York: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Marine Layer 7" Hybrid Short

7" Hybrid Short

at Marine Layer

$58retailer claims $98
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Marine Layer
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Marine Layer's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 3 of 6 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Marine Layer — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Measured: 2 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 2 songs on Genius carry it in the title (top: “Marine Layer — Modern Crusoe”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Taylor Stitch The Carnegie Pant in Bourbon Corduroy
$84retailer claims $168
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Taylor Stitch
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Taylor Stitch's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.5/15

70% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 7 of 10 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Taylor Stitch — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Taylor Stitch: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Born Primitive Op Assault Pant Factory Blemished (Multicam)
$150retailer claims $300
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Born Primitive
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Born Primitive's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.7/15

71% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Born Primitive — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Born Primitive: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

Roark Layover Pants - Black
$57retailer claims $95
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Roark
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Roark's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10.7/15

71% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 5 of 7 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Roark — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 0/12

Measured for Roark: 2 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “Рорк (Roark) — Loqiemean”) — below the points threshold. 0, from real numbers.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

BALENCIAGA BALENCIAGA | CARGO CAPRI PANTS
$716.09retailer claims $1790
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 10/15

67% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 2 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 1/12

Measured: 3 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

SONG FOR THE MUTE Rope Drawcord Trousers (242-MPT065-BLACK)
$342.50retailer claims $685
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

DURAN LANTINK DURAN LANTINK | LEATHER BIKER PANTS
$1080.09retailer claims $2700
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

SONG FOR THE MUTE Rope Tailored Trousers (232-MPT084-BLACK)
$362.50retailer claims $725
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at H. Lorenzo
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits H. Lorenzo's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for H. Lorenzo — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3/12

Measured: 0 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · carried by ~2 independent stores in our catalog. Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

GIVENCHY GIVENCHY | POCKET COCOON TROUSERS
$540.09retailer claims $1350
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 5/15

33% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 3 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 6/12

Hand-set editorial floor 6/12 (floors are capped at 9 — only measured signals can award the top tier). Measured for GIVENCHY so far: 7 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →

VALENTINO VALENTINO | WASHED VELVET PANT
$700.09retailer claims $1750
unverified — retailer's word onlyWhy this is amberNo independent evidence found — the discount is the retailer's own claim, and is labeled (and ranked) accordingly.How we verify →checked 38d ago
Get it at Maxfield
score 38 why?

Deal score 38/100 — the receipts

open any row for what was measured

real discount ×0.8 (corroborated) 27.2/34

Measured at −40% or deeper against the was-price, which fits Maxfield's own measured markdown pattern (corroborated) — so it counts at ×0.8. Scale: −10% → 10.2 · −25% → 22.1 · −40% → 34.

price position 5/10

No cross-store price match was available when this offer was scored, so it takes the fixed neutral 5 — missing data is never a bonus or a penalty.

rating confidence 4/9

No usable review data exists for this product, so it takes the fixed neutral 4 — missing reviews never read as good ones or bad ones.

size availability 7.5/15

50% of the size run was in stock when scored — right now 1 of 2 tracked sizes show stock.

retailer quality 6/10

Hand-set rating for Maxfield — returns window and cost, shipping threshold, track record. Same number on every deal this store sells, affiliated or not (6 = vetted-baseline default).

momentum 0/10

Nothing measured — no fresh-markdown timestamp or sell-through read existed for this offer, so it takes 0. We don't fake “trending.”

cultural relevance 3.3/12

Measured: 6 articles mention it in our sample of English-language world news · 1 song on Genius carries it in the title (top: “VALENTINO — 24kGoldn”). Brand-level and merchant-blind — same points at every store selling it.

-15 — past its re-check window (−1/hr over, floor −15)

Same math for every store, paying or not. How we score →